Supreme Court Cracks Down On Soaring Airfares Issues Notice To Centre And DGCA

The Supreme Court of India took strong note of excessive airfare hikes during festive seasons and adverse weather. The court said such sudden spikes cannot be ignored. It observed that passengers are being unfairly burdened. The issue was raised through a public interest petition. Judges made it clear that unchecked pricing will invite judicial scrutiny. The matter has national importance.

What Did The Court Say About Airfare Fluctuations?

The bench said unpredictable airfare jumps amount to exploitation. It noted that prices rise sharply without justification. The court stressed that airlines cannot take advantage of emergencies. Such practices hurt common travelers the most. The judges said intervention is necessary. Passenger interest must come before profit. Market freedom cannot mean public suffering.

Who Has Been Issued Notices By The Court?

The Supreme Court issued notices to the central government and the aviation regulator. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation has been asked to respond. The Centre was told to clarify its stand. Both must file replies on the issue. The court wants accountability. Regulatory silence will not be accepted.

What Examples Did The Judges Highlight?

The bench referred to airfares during Kumbh and festivals. Judges pointed to routes like Delhi to Prayagraj and Jodhpur. They said prices on these routes show clear exploitation. Even weather disruptions were cited. The court said travelers are left helpless. Such examples underline the seriousness of the issue.

What Is The Petition Demanding?

The petition seeks binding regulatory guidelines. It demands control over airfare pricing and extra charges. A strong and independent regulator has been proposed. The plea also questions baggage policy changes. Free check-in limits were reduced without logic. Passengers were forced to pay extra. The petition calls this arbitrary and unfair.

How Are Passenger Rights Being Affected?

The plea argues that airline practices violate fundamental rights. Arbitrary pricing affects equality and freedom of movement. Sudden service cuts add to passenger hardship. Complaint redressal mechanisms are weak. Dynamic pricing lacks transparency. Poor and emergency travelers suffer the most. The court acknowledged these concerns.

What Happens Next In The Case?

The Centre sought time to submit its response. The Supreme Court granted the request. The next hearing is scheduled for February twenty three. The court will review replies carefully. Strong directions may follow. The case could reshape airfare regulation. Passengers across India are watching closely.